Who are the most solid lenders on Mintos? Our Mintos lender ratings

Last updated - 24 August 2021

Mintos lenders can default or close down - choosing the best lenders is important

In 2017, Mintos lender Eurocent failed, and defaulted on its Mintos ‘buyback guarantee’ commitments. Since then there have been defaults and issues with several other lenders. Over the last 4 years we have been providing the scores and data on this page – our Mintos lender ratings. Our goal is to provide investors with key information on each lender, and a rating score to help highlight those that are lowest and highest risk. 

To begin with, below we discuss some recent events:

Mintos becomes a regulated investment firm

Mintos has announced that it has been licenced by the Latvian authorities to operate a licenced investment platform and also be an electronic money issuer. What does that mean for Mintos investors? The most obvious benefit we can see is actually the electronic money licence. This should improve the safety of cash held on deposit at Mintos, as each investor will have their funds sitting in individually assigned IBANs, with the funds held in custody at regulated banks. Mintos also highlights that it will change the structure of the loans it sells to make them qualify as regulated assets. This will give investors some protections under European Union law (MiFID II). Mintos has also announced that it will be able to sell products such as ETF’s to its investors. We can see why this may be a good ‘cross-sell’ opportunity for Mintos, but it is not clear why investors would chose Mintos to buy ETF’s rather than a dedicated brokerage service.

Aforti litigation is successful - investors achieve a full recovery

Polish lender Aforti defaulted on its obligations to Mintos investors in 2019. The situation has always been a little mysterious as the company has continued to trade, and also remain listed on the Warsaw stock exchange. Mintos launched litigation against the company in 2020 and it has been successful. A bailiff was appointed by the Polish courts earlier this year, who was successful in seizing and selling assets owned by Aforti. Mintos has now announced that it has recovered sufficient funds to full repay all principal amounts outstanding, and some interest accrued since 2019. This is an excellent result, particularly as the Mintos recovery team had said that they were uncertain how much they would be able to recover for investors.

Mintos updates its ratings

Mintos recently published some updates to its ratings. There were no big surprises. Companies receiving upgrades were Eleving (Mogo), Iute Credit, Finclusion, Sun Finance and Credissimo. The only downgrade was Lime Zaim of Russia..

Creamfinance exits Denmark

In 2020 Denmark introduced an interest rate cap on personal loans. That completely killed the business models of many lenders offering short-term loans in the country. We have been cautious about the potential regulatory risks from investing in loans in Denmark for some time. As we note below, Sun Finance has attempted some rule ‘workarounds’, the legality of which has been called into question. Another Mintos lender, Creamfinance has instead decided to just quit and leave Denmark instead. That’s probably a more prudent corporate decision. All Mintos investors have had their Creamfinance Denmark investments repaid.

Akulaku investors achieve a full recovery

Akulaku is an Indonesian fintech lender. It has received investments from some very notable firms such as Sequoia and Ant Financial. It also held $76m of cash in the latest financial statements it uploaded to Mintos. That is why many, including us, were surprised that it was one of the first firms to be suspended in 2020 following the outbreak of Covid. Where had all the cash gone? Why had they been able to raise more equity from their numerous backers? That has never been explained adequately. However, the good news is that investors have now received a full recovery on their investments in Akulaku loans, six months faster than had been expected. That is an  important result because at the time of suspension Mintos investors were owed almost €21 million.

Mintos gives new recovery estimates

Mintos has provided its latest update on how much it expects to recover from each lender in default. Total recoveries are forecast to be 55-60% across the defaulted loan portfolio (which is higher than the last Mintos estimate of 50%). The companies that had their recovery estimates cut were Cashwagon and Dziesiatka. Mintos also announced for the first time that investors will receive less than full recoveries on exposures to Monego and Aforti. We are not fans of how Mintos distributes cash received from defaulted lenders. Rather than distributing it pro-rata based on how much is owed to each investor, it distributes it according to the maturity dates of the loans owned by each investor. This means in effect that investors holding short term loans will receive full recoveries, and investors in longer term loans will often receive nothing. This does not make sense to us. 

E-Cash is closing down. Investors will make a significant loss

Small Ukrainian lender E-Cash has announced that it is closing down. It has around €0.8m of loans outstanding on Mintos, with a further €0.4m of pending payments. Mintos has suspended E-Cash from the marketplace. We had rated E-Cash only 20/100 due to its small size, low capitalisation, and heavy losses in 2019. Mintos has now announced that the recovery rate for Mintos investors will be less than 25%. 

Key financial information of each Mintos lender

The table below captures the key financial information for each lender. This can be useful to quickly lookup the profile of each lender, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of each one.

All Figures in EUR million (profits annualised where appropriate):

Loan originator Reporting period Loans Equity Profit - latest Profit - prior year Profit - 2 years prior Audited?
Eleving (Mogo) Jun 2021 238 30 15.6 3.5 6.2
IDF Eurasia Kazakhstan Dec 2020 71.8 24 6 2.9 -0.3
Creditstar Jun 2021 161 36.2 7.4 6.6 5.8
Capital Service (D) Dec 2020 24.1 -1.5 -3.9 0.0 -0.5
Kredit Pintar Dec 2019 48.3 17.6 0.5 2.8
Credissimo Dec 2019 21.5 16.1 2.5 3.2 5.0
IuteCredit Jun 2021 88 23 6 5.2 8.1
ExpressCredit (D) Dec 2020 20.9 4.5 0.1 1.4 -1.6
DelfinGroup Mar 2021 35.5 8.7 3.7 3.9 2.9
GoCredit Jun 2021 11.2 8.1 1.5 1.1 0.32
LF Tech Jun 2021 22.3 8.3 8.5 X
Jet Finance Jun 2021 2.1 1.5 1.1 -1.9 -1.2
Conmigo Vales / CEGE Jun 2021 73.3 16.6 6.5 1.3 -3.4
ID Finance Mexico Jun 2021 12.7 3.5 2.1 1.4 -2.2
Pay PS Jun 2021 10.6 1.7 0.9 0.6 0.2
Watu Credit Uganda Jun 2021 13.7 1.3 0.9 -0.4
Capem Jun 2021 28.2 12.3 1.4 0.6 0.4
Alivio Jun 2021 8.7 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Sun Finance Denmark Sep 2020 11.6 3.8 4.4 2.1 0.0
Sun Finance Vietnam Nov 2019 1.4 -2.2 -2.4 X
Finko Dinero (D) Dec 2019 11.3 1.0 1.2 -1.5
Finko UkrPozyka (D) Dec 2019 5.0 1.0 -1.7
SOS Credit Sep 2020 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 X
DanaRupiah Dec 2020 0.7 0.8 0.0 2.2
Monego (D) Dec 2018 4.1 0.4 -0.6 0
Sun Finance (Tengo, Kaz.) Dec 2018 4.1 -0.4 X
Cashwagon (D) Feb 2020 27.9 1.0 -5.9 -7.0
Placet Group Jun 2021 47.9 24.5 3.8 3.7 3.1
Akulaku (S) Dec 2019 118.3 65.5 -33.9 -37.9 -22.1
Fenchurch Legal May 2021 10.4 0.5 0.5 X
AgroCredit Dec 2019 6.9 1.9 0.2 0.2 0.1
Wowwo Dec 2020 31.1 10.2 1.7 2.8 1.6
Evergreen Dec 2019 8.5 1.3 1.2 0.2 X
Creamfinance Dec 2020 38.7 11.0 -0.8 0.9 1.2
Extra Finance Dec 2018 4.6 2.0 0.1 2.0 2.0 X
Mozipo Group Dec 2019 14 4.9 0.0 0.3 0.5
Aasa Dec 2019 25.3 17.7 0.4 -9.3 X
Finitera Kredo Dec 2019 10.6 0.2 -1.2 -0.8 -0.2
Creditter Dec 2019 4.4 0.8 0.8 X
Pinjam Yuk Sep 2020 4.5 2.7 -3.8 1.2 X
Revo Technology Sep 2020 23 6.6 1.2 0.8 -1.2
Dozarplati Sep 2020 22.5 6.9 5.8 2.0 0.8 X
Capitalia Mar 2020 1.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0
EcoFinance Dec 2020 6.1 2.4 -1.8 -0.3 0.1
GFM Sep 2020 6.2 5.3 0.4 0.0 X
Dinerito Dec 2020 10.4 3.2 -0.1 0.2 -0.2
Hipocredit Dec 2019 6.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0
Finko Kiva (W) Dec 2019 3.5 0.6 -1.1 0.0
Debifo Dec 2018 7.8 0.1 -0.1 0.2 0.0 X
Kviku Jun 2021 15.2 5.8 5.9 1.2 0.8
Rapido (D) Dec 2018 1.8 -1.7 -1.7 -1.9 -0.8
Finitera Tigo Dec 2019 4.7 0.7 0.7 -0.8 -0.3
Julo Nov 2019 14.3 10.8 -2.0 X
Peachy (D) Dec 2018 5.7 -1.4 -0.4 -2
GetBucks (D) Jun 2019 92.1 -41.8 -51.2 -9.5 -12
Finclusion Mar 2021 12.3 8.6 -0.3 3.0 X
Credius Dec 2020 10.0 10.3 1.7 1.1 0.4
Rapicredit Sep 2020 6.9 0.7 -0.9 0.5 -0.6
Watu Credit Dec 2019 27.9 4.8 4.5 1.5 0.2
Podemos Progresar Dec 2020 9.0 6.5 1.6 1.1
Sun Finance Latvia Sep 2020 14.4 8.8 6.3 3.1 -0.7 X
Everest Finanse Dec 2020 90.1 65 2.2 9.0 7.2
Sun Finance Poland Mar 2020 19.5 2.5 4 2.4 -6.9 X
E-Cash Dec 2019 2.3 0.6 -1.3 -0.6 X
Esto Dec 2020 19.7 4.8 1.5 0.4 -0.1
Zenka Aug 2019 1 1.3 -1.7 X
AlfaKredyt Dec 2018 4.9 1.3 0.3 0.2 X
Mikro Kapital Russia Dec 2020 17.7 7.7 0.3 0.4 -0.3
Mikro Kapital Romania Dec 2020 25.6 5.7 0.3 -0.4
Mikro Kapital Uzbekistan Dec 2020 8.5 0.9 0.8 -0.3
Mikro Kapital Belarus Sep 2020 31.1 4.9 1.8 0.8
Mikro Kapital Moldova Dec 2020 16.3 4.0 0.4 0.2 0.4
Fireof Dec 2018 3.8 0.9 0.0 X
ID Finance Spain Sep 2020 40 8.8 4.5 3.3 0.1
TASCredit Sep 2020 25 5.5 2.9 2.0 0.9 X
Lime Zaim Dec 2020 9.3 4.1 0 1.4 0.4
Dineo Credito Dec 2019 8.1 1.1 3.4 2.2 2.8
Sun Finance Mexico Mar 2020 2.2 -0.4 -1.9 X
Dziesiątka Finanse (S) Dec 2019 9.5 3.4 0.5 0.2 0.0
Novaloans May 2019 5.3 1.1 0.7 0.6 X
Swell May 2021 7.0 4.0 0.1 -0.8 X
Alex Credit (D) Mar 2019 3.1 1.3 0.6 -0.3 X
CashCredit Sep 2020 5.7 3.2 0.3 0.8 0.1

Note: S = Suspended D= Defaulted W = Solvent windown

Our Mintos lender ratings

Our Mintos lender ratings are based on 5 characteristics – profitability, capitalisation, size, track record and the quality of their reporting. We have allocated marks out of 20 for each metric, giving a total score out of 100. Mintos have recently changed their ratings system, which is now a number from 0-10. A W/D indicates that Mintos has withdrawn their rating. 

Consider country risk too

Mintos offers loans from many different countries around the world, and some countries are more risky than others.  To help investors assess the risk level of each country, we have published a country risk ratings page. This takes into account factors such as currency risks, sovereign risk and the local business environment. We think it is worth considering these risks when building a portfolio allocation, in addition to the LO ratings above. 

Key updates: August 2021

New: Capem

Capem is one of a huge number of new Mexican companies to join Mintos this month. It's not clear why there are so many all of a sudden but we think some, such as Capem, are good additions to the platform. Capem provides loans to small and mid-sized businesses. Their lending performance since the Covid outbreak has been very good, with low levels of non-performing loans. The company says that it is due to their very detailed underwriting of loans and ongoing advice provided to clients. It seems to be working. Our initial score is 65

Returning: ID Finance Mexico

ID Finance Mexico has returned to Mintos under a new company structure. Which is good, because the old company it operated under had a big negative equity position after significant losses in 2018 and 2019. It was forced to leave Mintos during 2020. The new company operating the business now says it was profitable in 2020 and profits are on track to be higher this year. The balance sheet leverage is still higher than we would like to see. The high leverage, and chequered track record led to our new score of the relaunched ID Finance being 48

New: Pay PS

Pay PS is a very typical Mintos lender. It operates in Russia, specialises in high cost unsecured personal loans, and it is quite small, with a loan portfolio of €11 million. The company does seem to have fairly good technology in place, and they have been profitable over the last 18 months in a difficult operating environment. Their main weaknesses are their small size, high leverage and limited track record. Our initial score is 49

New: Watu Uganda

Watu Uganda is a sister company to Watu Kenya. Watu Kenya seems to have quietly left Mintos after experiencing some Covid related issues, but all Mintos investors seem to have been repaid. Watu has a good business model that benefits society. Loans are secured on motorbikes. The motorbikes provide borrowers with income acting as local taxi riders. The company reports an unaudited profit of €0.9m in the most recent year. Watu's small size, limited track record and location impacts its initial score which is 41

New: GoCredit

Many new Mexican lenders have joined Mintos this month and we think GoCredit is the best of them. GoCredit makes most of its revenues lending to borrowers who then receive repayments directly from employers as a deduction from salary payments. This is quite a low risk type of lending as shown in the GoCredit P&L where the ratio of interest earned to bad debts expense is very good - around 8 to 1. Mintos have also put into place some structural features that reduces the impact if GoCredit becomes insolvent. GoCredit also has a strong balance sheet structure, with a lot of equity funding its assets. Our initial score is 66

New: Conmigo Vales

Another Mexican lender to join is Conmigo Vales. It has a very old fashioned business model involving lots of human interaction. Loans are made via vouchers to be used at certain stores. It is hard to see that a company like Conmigo Vales will ever be particularly profitable or have a bright future. For the purposes of our score we have relied heavily on the guarantee provided by its much larger parent CEGE. CEGE would likely receive a score in the high 60's if it listed loans directly on Mintos. However our score for Conmigo Vales is 50, which reflects the ultra small size of Conmigo Vales, its poor business model, and the risk that the guarantee may not be effective

New: Alivio

Alivio is a small Mexican lender that focuses on providing finance to cover health care costs. There is little public provision of health care in Mexico and we could imagine that there could be a profitable opportunity in this space. Unfortunately Alivio has not really generated much profit so far, only breaking even since 2018. The other main negative is the balance sheet structure of Alivio - it is more leveraged than most Mintos loan originators, which makes it more risky for buyers of its loans. Our initial score is 48

Returning: LF Tech

LF Tech has returned to Mintos. It is a Kazakhstan lender that provides payday loans and also loans secured on cars. The quality of financial information provided by LF Tech has always been very poor. The presentation uploaded by management has a lot of content, almost all of which is not very useful. The unaudited results published for 1H 2021 are very good, with a profit of €4.2m. That's very high given that their loan porfolio is only €22m in size. Our new score is 48. We will reassess this once new audited numbers become available

New: Jet Finance

Jet Finance is actually the former Mogo Kazakhstan business that has been taken over by the local management team. The fact that Mogo decided to abandon Kazakhstan doesn't fill us with much confidence in the prospects of Jet Finance. Still, they managed to make a profit of €0.5m in 1H 2021 after heavy losses in 2019 and 2020. The quality of the management presentation is very good for such a small company. Our initial score is 42. This will go up when there is more evidence that the turnaround is successful and the company gets bigger

Eleving (Mogo)

Eleving had a very difficult 2020. It made a big loss in the first half of the year and started to run very tight on capital. It's loan book also started to deteriorate quickly due to Covid impacts. However it now seems to have turned the corner. It has announced a profit of €7.8m for 1H 2021, and falling levels of non-performing loans. It still remains over-leveraged in our view, but this is less of a concern if it can continue to make strong profits. Our score is up by 3 to 68

Kviku

Kviku is based in Russia but now has lending operations in six countries in Europe and Asia. It appears on many P2P sites and recently started its own P2P site. It has started to show really promising signs in the last 12 months, with strong growth and increasing profits. It announced a profit of €3m for 1H 2020, and is generating some of the highest returns on assets we have seen recently. The main negative for Kviku is that it is still fairly small, but this is offset by a good track record and sensible balance sheet structure. Our score is up 5 to 62

Score retained: Creditstar

Creditstar has announced an (unaudited) profit of €2m for Q2 2021, up from €1.7m profit in Q1. Everything published looks good - steady growth, strong profits, and the issuance of new bonds to investors. The key thing many investors are focused on is the publication of audited results. Creditstar have promised the release of 2020 figures audited by KPMG later this month. We are looking forward to seeing these, and will reassess our score when they arrive. For now, our score remains unchanged at 72

Note: Capital Service

The Capital Service sitaution has been frustrating for Mintos investors. It blamed Covid and new laws in Poland for defaulting in 2020. It tried to use this as an opportunity to force Mintos investors to accept a big 'haircut' to their claims. This was rightly rejected however there is still a lot of uncertainty about when and how the company will be able to repay most of the amounts due. The company disclosed a loss of €3.9m for 2020, leaving it with negative equity of €1.5m. That's not as bad as expected, and shows that the terms of their initial proposal to investors was not justifiable in any way

Key updates: July 2021

Everest

Everest is a Polish lending company. We downgraded the score of Everest last year because of the introduction of new laws that hurt its business model, and also because it has an old fashioned approach that relies on 'face to face' meetings with borrowers that would be impacted by Covid. Everest announced a 75% fall in profits for 2020. However we noticed that their Q4 results seemed to be very strong and that it feels confident that its business model is now sustainable. Their balance sheet remains strong. We have increased our score from 58 to 64

Swell

Swell is another lending company that we have been fairly bearish about, as it is based in Mexico and lends to small businesses (high impact from Covid). It made a large loss in 2020 (relative to its capital base) but it seems to have turned the corner. Cost cutting has helped it to make a small (unaudited) profit in the first 5 months of this year. Swell will never be one of the best lending companies on Mintos, but even so, we have increased our score from 36 to 43

Credius

Credius is a fairly small Romanian lending company that appears to be very well managed. It announced an increase in (audited) profits in 2020 from €1.1m to €1.7m. It did this while cutting lending in response to Covid, and also significantly cutting its operating costs too. That seems like a very impressive outcome and the sort of management response to Covid we would hope to see. The Credius balance sheet remains one of the most conservative of all the Mintos lenders. Our score is up from 68 to 71

Score retained: Placet Group

We have long been fans of Placet Group because it is so consistent. It announced first half profits for 2021 of €1.9m. It has generated audited profits of between €3-4m for the last 3 years and it looks like 2021 will be the same outcome. Its balance sheet remains conservative, with around half of loans funded with shareholders equity. We recommend that investors check out Placet Group's own P2P site Moncera, where rates and loan availability are usually better than on Mintos. Our score remains 79

Wowwo

Wowwo is a Turkish company with a similar business model to Mogo/Eleving. It recently published its audited accounts for 2020 and a Q1 2021 update. A few things definitely jumped out at us when we reviewed the figures. First, the audited profits were only half as big as had been published in their uploaded management accounts. We would normally expect to see some variation of audited results but not a difference that large. We have asked Mintos to obtain an explanation from the company for the big

difference. Second, the auditor had given a qualified opinion. Although it only related to one specific topic it is not something we would expect to see and raises questions about the quality of the finance team at Wowwo. Finally, the company reduced the size of its loan portfolio materially during Q4 2020 and made a small loss (according to its management accounts). Wowwo says it has made an (unaudited) profit of €2m in Q1 2021 but for now we are a little skeptical about any of its management accounting numbers, and await an explanation about what happened in 2020. Our new score is down 13 to 59

New: Fenchurch Legal

Fenchurch Legal is a subsidiary of a new specialty finance company in the UK. It provides loans to law firms that are used to fund various small size lawsuits in the UK. The loans are secured against the litigation proceeds and also the value of any insurance payouts in the event that a claim is not successful. In theory it sounds like a pretty interesting niche with only limited risks. One thing that has not been disclosed is how many clients Fenchurch Legal has, and how diversified their lending portfolio is. Law firms can and do close down and

the lack of disclosure around this is disappointing. Fenchurch says that it made a profit of €0.5m in the year to May 2021. Its parent, SHP Capital provides a group guarantee. The company started in 2019 and only provides very limited, unaudited financial information. We think litigation finance is an interesting space. However our preferred exposure (for those who like to take risks) would be via AxiaFunder. They have already settled 5 out of 12 funded cases so far and investor returns / IRRs have been on average 55% which is phenomenal. As for Fenchurch Legal – our initial score is 42

Score retained: Iute

Iute has achieved some of our highest scores because of their high quality financial reporting, a long and profitable track record, and a sensible balance sheet structure. Their Q2 21 profits grew strongly to €1.9m, up from €1.1m in Q1. The proportion of non-performing loans continued to fall. Our score remains at 77

Podemos Progresar

Podemos Progresar is an unusual Mexican lending business. It focuses on lending to women only, and it obtains guarantees from people linked to the borrower to reduce the cost of bad debts. When it launched on Mintos in 2020 it did not provide full financial information or historical results and our scores reflected this. It has now published audited results showing a strong result for 2020 - a profit of €1.6m, up 40% on 2019. The main negative is its small size, with assets of less than €10m. We have increased our score from 47 to 57

Key updates: June 2021

Cream

Cream announced a loss of €0.8m for 2020. That's not terrible given the circumstances and the size of their business. We have been told that they have returned to profitability in 2021 although this is not verified. Cream have €9m of intangible assets in their balance sheet, which is a lot given that they have only €11m of capital. Our score is down 8, to 55

New: Mikro Capital Uzbekistan

Mikro Capital has several subsidiaries that list loans on Mintos, some with group guarantees and some without. It's Uzbekistan subsidiary is now active and has a group guarantee. It is a small but profitable business. Our initial score is 43. Our score does not attribute any value to the group guarantee but we acknowledge that in some situations it may have value for Mintos investors

Dana Rupiah

Indonesian lender Dana Rupiah has provided proper financial disclosures for the first time. It shows a business that was profitable during 2019 and then broke even in 2020. In response to Covid-19 it dramatically shrunk the size of its business last year. It is now extremely small - less than €1m of loans and equity. Following our review of the financial statements their score increased slightly, but remains low at 28

Score retained: Placet Group

Placet Group has been at the top of our ratings for a while, and its results in Q1 2021 gave us no reason to change our views. It made a profit of €1.1m for the quarter (up 12% on Q1 20). It continues to have a very conservative balance sheet structure, with a 50/50 funding split between debt and equity. It has been growing its loan book, but not too quickly. Our score remains at 79

Key updates: May 2021

Mogo

Mogo really struggled during 2020 but it seems to have turned the corner. It made a profit of €3.5m during Q1 21 compared to a €2.5m loss in Q1 20. Mogo also announced a €5.3m capital raise. This was done via a subordinated debt issue. It's not clear to us why shareholders are not willing to inject funds via a share issue.

We think the subordinated debt is a weaker form of equity injection and we have given less credit to it in our capital scoring than if ‘real’ equity was injected. High leverage remains Mogo’s biggest weakness. Mogo’s loan portfolio seems to be performing fine, with stable NPL ratios. Our new score is 65, up 4

Score retained: Delfin

Delfin announced a Q1 profit of €0.8m for Q1 21. That's slightly down on previous quarters but still a good result. Credit quality in its loan portfolio remains very stable. We saw no reason to change our previous score of 77

Score retained: Iute

It's a very similar story for Iute, another high rated lender. It announced Q1 21 profits of €1.1m. Its balance sheet was very stable and loan quality improved, with the net NPL ratio falling from 16.6% to 13.1%. Our score remains at 77

Lime Zaim

Lime Zaim was badly hit by Covid in the first half of 2020, which resulted in losses caused by increasing bad debt provisions. However, it seems to have had a very strong recovery during Q4 20, which led to the company breaking even for the year. This improved performance led to our score increasing by 5 to 52

Farewell to...

Kredit24, Acema and Swiss Credit have left Mintos. In the case of Kredit24, the company ceased operations but investors have now been paid back in full. Mintos announced that Acema and Swiss Credit are leaving because the companies did not provide enough loans to Mintos investors (which makes sense to us). All investors have been repaid.

Score retained: Creditstar

Creditstar has announced a (unaudited) profit of €1.7m for Q1 2020. That's a 25% increase on the previous quarter due to growing revenues and lower impairment charges. Creditstar has announced that KPMG are currently auditing their 2020 results, which will be released "during the summer". If there are no issues, our current score of 72 is likely to increase

EcoFinance

EcoFinance is a small Russian lender. It's not doing very well, and made a loss of €1.8m in 2020. So why are we upgrading the score? It received an equity injection of €2.4m during Q4 2020, sufficient to cover the loss made. Our score increased by 8 to 40

Mikro Kapital Moldova

Mikro Kapital Moldova performed fairly well in 2020, making a profit of €0.4m. However we noticed that it made a loss during Q4 20, and also increased its balance sheet leverage. This led to its score falling by 3 to 51

Kviku

Kviku offers loans on Mintos as well as its own P2P site where rates are currently up to 12%. It is a fairly 'average' mid-sized lender operating across 6 countries. It increased it's profitability quite significantly during Q4 20, leading to a profit of €1.1m for the year. Our score increased by 2 to 57

Updates: April 2021

New: Swell

Swell is a fairly small lending business based in Mexico. It focused on lending to small businesses in the country. We were not that impressed by the company's presentation - it doesn't seem to have any technology or strategy to differentiate itself. The balance sheet structure is fine, but it doesn't seem to have a profitable business model, and is loss making. Our initial score is 36

Esto

Esto is a lender based in Estonia. It has been growing steadily since it joined Mintos a couple of years ago. It performed well during 2020, announcing a profit of €1.5m. We just hope it doesn't increase leverage too much further from current levels. Our score increased by 3 to 65

Kviku

Kviku is a mid-sized Russian lender that is active on Mintos while also having its own P2P platform. Its results to September 2020 indicate that its profit for the year should be stable relative to 2019&18. The area of focus remains leverage - it has a relatively small amount of equity for the size of its lending operations. Our score increased by 2 to 55

Note: Mozipo

Mintos recently uploaded an excerpt of Mozipo's 2019 audited financial statements. Frankly, it is not clear what the situation is at the company. In 2018 the company disclosed a large negative equity position.The new figures show 'restated' figures for 2018 that look much better, and €4.9m of equity as of Dec 2019. Our view remains however that this company is best avoided, with a score of 35

Updates: March 2021

Score retained: Placet Group

Placet group announced an (unaudited) profit of €3.3m for 2020. That's a strong result given the challenges faced by lenders during the year, and slightly higher than 2019. While monthly profits fell a little during Q4, they seem to have rebounded in January and February. Their balance sheet structure remains conservative. Our score remains at 79

Note: IDF Eurasia

We have decided to alter our scoring approach to IDF Eurasia. We had previously provided data and scores for the holding company. However following discussions with Mintos it has become clear that the holding company was unlikely to provide sufficient financial information in the future for us to make an assessment. As the only subsidiary

active on Mintos is the Kazakhstan subsidiary, we are now presenting financial information and scores just for this entity. The quality of information available about this entity is better than average, particularly because it recently published a prospectus as part of a bond issue. Our initial score is 63.

Score retained: Wowwo

Wowwo is a car finance and retailing business based in Turkey. Wowwo released very strong results for Q3 2020. The strong results were during a period of depreciation of the Turkish Lira. Since then Lira has been volatile but it is currently trading at similar levels to last September. Our score remains at 72, supported by strong profitability and over €16m of shareholders equity.

Score retained: IuteCredit

IuteCredit published audited financials showing a profit of €5.2m for 2020. This is lower than 2019, mainly due to higher bad debt costs and some FX losses. The company was successful in cutting costs to offset some of the challenges that Covid-19 caused. Overall, the company has been performing well. It has strong growth plans - we will be monitoring to make sure this does not create too much leverage of their balance sheet. Our score remains 77.

Score retained: Delfin

Delfin group announced an (unaudited) profit of €3.6m for 2020. While this was slightly down on 2019, that is a very credible result given the impacts from Covid-19. One of the things we like about Delfin is that they have to comply with leverage covenants under the terms of their bond program. Delfin's leverage is well inside the covenant level. Our score remains at 77, one of the highest on Mintos.

Farewell to...

Stikcredit. Bulgarian lender Stikcredit has decided to quit Mintos to focus on starting up its own brand new P2P site, Afranga. The company has released new results for 2020 and they were very good given the circumstances. Stikcredit is offering very high interest rates at Afranga - 18% (maybe too high)? You can find the latest financials and our updated rating score for Stikcredit here.

Farewell to...

Aasa. We are pleased to see European lending group Aasa leave Mintos because they were a company that we were never able to get comfortable with. The information they published was inadequate, confusing and hinted at big problems.

Updates: February 2021

Mogo

In November we cut the score of Mogo following a Q3 loss of €3.5m and a decline in its capital base. Mogo has announced a significant Q4 profit of €9.1m. However, €6m of this comes from revaluing portfolios that the company acquired only a few months prior. This seems like a strange accounting approach. Putting that aside, the underlying results were however still a significant improvement on Q3.

We were also pleased to see that the company is (finally) taking steps to reduce its FX risk. Mogo has also announced that they are hoping to obtain an equity injection from new investors. That’s a good idea, because the company currently feels a little over-leveraged right now.

To reflect the turnaround in performance, our score is up 8 to 61.

Score retained: Iute Credit

Iute Credit's Q4 results were in line with expectations, resulting in a €5.2m profit for 2020. Iute seems to have done a good job of managing the challenges of 2020. While impairment costs rose significantly, the company was able to charge higher fees and heavily cut operating costs. Iute remains one of our highest rated loan originators, with a score of 77.

Score retained: Creditstar

Creditstar has been one of the most discussed LO's in the last 12 months. There has been 3 main criticisms from some investors - high levels of pending payments on Mintos, the lack of a big 4 / credible auditor, and the need to refinance several bond issues. These were all valid concerns. However, they are areas that the company seems to have made good progress recently.

The company had promised to clear the pending payments in the new year, and they have achieved that, with only a minor amount remaining at the end of January. The company successfully issued €20m of bonds in December (although admittedly at quite a high yield of 13.5%). The next issuance is planned in May 2021. On the audit side, the company has committed to using ‘an internationally recognised accounting firm’ (thought to be KPMG) to audit the 2020 results.

The audit of the 2020 results by a major audit firm will generate a lot of confidence among investors. That’s because based on the results provided to us, the company performed well during 2020. It has announced preliminary results for the year that show a profit of €5.7m. The underlying earnings during Q4 improved significantly compared to Q3, due to strong growth in net interest income and falling loan impairment charges. We would like to see Creditstar raise some equity during the first half of 2021 – it 

has always operated with a fairly stretched balance sheet. It seems to have strong growth plans, and it is going to require an equity injection if it wants to do this while retaining the confidence of its creditors. Our score remains 72.

Updates: December 2020

Lime Zaim

Lime Zaim is an online lender based in Russia. We cut the scores of all the Russian lenders earlier this year because of the negative outlook caused by both Covid-19 and the drop in oil prices. Lime has disclosed that it lost €0.9m in the first 9 months of 2020. That leaves the company with only
€3m of equity, which we would like to see them increase in the coming months. The loss was slightly higher than we had expected, and the Lime score has fallen 9 to 47.

Ecofinance

Ecofinance is another lender based in Russia. Like Lime Zaim, it's also not doing very well right now. As of September 30 it essentially had no equity left, after big losses this year. The company is small, and lost money last year too. That puts it pretty high on our list of lenders that could potentially vanish pretty quickly. We were expecting issues at Ecofinance, but they have burned through their equity faster than expected. As a result we have cut their score by 11 to 34.

Pinjam Yuk

Pinjam Yuk is a small lender based in Indonesia. It has just published results for the first 9 months of 2020 and things are not looking good for them. The company lost $3.5m in that period, which is more than the amount of equity that the company has remaining. The next 6 months will be very important for the company. Our new score is down 9 to 32.

Everest Finanse

In April we cut the score of Everest strongly. Although the company was very profitable, we had concerns about how well the business would do during Covid as it relied on face to face operations. It was also based in Poland, whose government brought in many regulations that impacted lenders. To some extent we have been proved right, with a 90% fall in profits during 2020. However it could have been worse. Our new score is up 5 to 58.

Kredit Pintar

Kredit Pintar is an Asian lending group. In October we cut their score because they still had not published any financial information for 2019. They have now released their audited results. Profits were down on 2018, but otherwise there were no big surprises. Our new score is up 4 to 57.

Dozarplati

Dozarplati is a Russian lender that is doing much better than many of its competitors in the country. It has been growing very quickly. This has translated into growing profits too - it is on track to make almost €6m this year. The main thing to keep an eye on is the company's leverage - it seems to have been paying out a lot of the profits generated as dividends. Our score is up 11 to 56.

Mikro Kapital Belarus

We have cut the score of Mikro Kapital Belarus for 2 reasons. Firstly, the company disclosed a significant increase in leverage during 2020. Secondly, there are significant political events taking place in the country, and it is unclear what impact this will have on the economy and lenders. Our score is down 9 to 54.

Mikro Kapital Russia

Mikro Kapital is yet another Russian lender who has released new results this month. We had cut their score earlier this year due to the troubled conditions in the country. The business managed to break even in the year to September, which was a better than expected result. The balance sheet structure also looks reasonable for a business of its size. Our score increased 8 to 53.

Score retained: Esto

Esto is a mid-sized Estonian lender. Since listing on Mintos, all of its metrics have tended to be in the middle of the range we see for lenders at Mintos. Everything seems to be going to plan for Esto this year, with profits slightly ahead of the prior year. Leverage is slightly higher than we would like to see. We have retained a score of 63 for Esto.

Wowwo

Wowwo is a company that has split opinion amongst Mintos investors. Some worry about the depreciation seen in the Turkish Lira in particular. Others see a business that is well run and has made profits in the past even with big currency devaluations. Results for 2020 have been strong so far, with profit up more than 100% year on year. We have increased the score by 2 to 72.

Updates: November 2020

Sun Finance

Sun Finance has provided updated financials for its subsidiaries in Denmark, Poland and Latvia. Each reported strong profits in the year to September. The results for Poland and Denmark were surprising, as other lenders in these countries have suffered from new regulations that have affected collection rates and profitability.

We have upgraded the ratings of these subsidiaries, but hope to learn more about how the Denmark and Poland subsidiaries have been able to perform so well. The weaker subsidiaries in Vietnam, Mexico and Kazakhstan did not provide any financial updates. These subsidiaries receive a group guarantee. However, as Mintos has a poor track record when it comes to enforcing group guarantees, we plan to continue rating these subsidiaries on

the basis of their own financials and track record. The Sun Finance group reported a profit of €12.1m in the 9 months to September, which was a strong result.

Wowwo

Wowwo published its audited financial statements for 2019. We are normally happy to receive audited figures, but unfortunately the audit opinion was qualified in several different areas. We have cut the disclosure quality score by 3 to reflect this. Our revised score for Wowwo is now 70.

Mogo

Mogo has been really struggling during 2020 and that negative trend accelerated during Q3 2020 when it announced a loss of €3.5m for the quarter, and €7.4m year to date. Mogo's major problem is the growth in loan provisions as a result of growing levels of non-performing loans. However it is also now feeling the impact of running significant FX risks from borrowing in Euros and lending in local currencies in

emerging markets. It also appears to have paid €4.7m of goodwill during Q3 on its acquisition of Kredo and Tigo. This acquisition, and the price paid looks very questionable given the current circumstances of Mogo. Another factor to highlight is that a large proportion of the reported equity consists of subordinated loans. This is lower quality capital than subscribed equity and there has been insufficient disclosures surrounding the terms of the instruments. Tangible shareholders equity (after deducting goodwill and 

intangible assets) had fallen to only €0.1m as of Sep 30, which is concerning. Ratings firm Fitch has issued a negative outlook. One positive of their analysis is that Fitch are treating the subordinated debt as equity after presumably having reviewed the terms and structure of the instruments. Mogo announced that it had stopped lending in several countries, and was focusing on debt collection. These are probably sensible actions but they are not decisions that are made when things are going to plan. The continued losses, 

uncertain outlook, non-core acquisitions, FX risks and deterioration in the size and quality of Mogo’s capital base means that we have significantly cut Mogo’s score from 72 to 53. 

Creditstar

Creditstar announced a headline profit of just over €2m for Q3. However when digging into the numbers we noticed that this includes a gain of €1.6m booked on revaluing a portfolio that was purchased (which is a surprising accounting treatment), and it also excludes an FX loss of €0.4m. That means that the underlying result was only breakeven. Our score has been cut from 76 to 72.

Score retained: Placet

Placet continue to perform well, and it has announced a profit of €3m in the 9 months to September. We don't expect Placet Group loans to be listed much longer on Mintos. They have recently repurchased €1m of loans, and are focusing on offering their loans via Moncera, and exploring other funding options. Our score remains at 79.

ID Finance Spain

ID Finance Spain recently provided a financial update that lacked much detail. Positives are that they reported a profit of €3.4m in the 9 months to September, and growth in shareholders equity. Negatives are the very poor quality of financial reporting and what seems to be increased leverage of the business. Our score has slightly fallen from 54 to 52.

New: Podemos Progesar

Podemos is a strange Mexican lender. It seems to be run for profit but has social objectives. Loans are all guaranteed by several people. The quality of information provided by the company is very poor. The business is currently mainly equity funded and it says it made a profit in the year to August. That's pretty much it. Other Mexican lenders on Mintos have been performing poorly this year. Investors should be cautious. Our initial score is 44.

IDF Eurasia

We have decided to continue cutting the score of IDF Eurasia. They make us nervous because they continue to publish quarterly updates that seem intentionally designed to avoid providing any hard numbers (like whether they made a profit or loss...) The Kazakhstan subsidiary that issues loans on Mintos appears to be performing adequately based on a recent bond prospectus we have obtained. But for now, we are losing confidence in the group and will wait for solid information before we change our mind. Our new score is down 13 to 46.

Score retained: Delfin

Delfin have announced profits of €3.2m in the 9 months to September. Notable events during Q3 were the issuance of €3.5m of unsecured 2 year bonds, and the payment of a €2m dividend. Operating performance was stable, and we have retained our score of 77.

Stikcredit

We have identified an error with the P&L translation uploaded by Stikcredit to Mintos. We had reduced their profitability score because it seemed that most of the 2019 profit related to a tax credit. We have seen from other sources that was not the case and the presentation of figures is incorrect. We have increased their profitability score and reduced their disclosure quality score. The net result is a net score increase of 3, to 51.

Next step: consider adding these sites to your portfolio

EstateGuru logo

EstateGuru is an excellent site that offers loans secured on real estate. Rates are high - around 11%. Currently mainly focused on the Baltic region of Europe but with plans to expand into other countries.

Viventor logo

Viventor is a similar site to Mintos, just smaller. Some secured loans are available. We also provide Viventor lender ratings.

Bulkestate logo

Bulkestate is a small but growing site focused on loans secured on real estate. It offers loans secured by real estate. Their rates are the highest in Europe for secured loans currently (11-14%)

October P2P logo

October is focused on lending to small businesses in France, Spain and Italy. Rates are often a little lower than the other sites we list here, but some investors will like October due to the countries it operates in.

All information published on ExploreP2P is subject to important disclaimers contained on our legal page here. No liability is accepted for the accuracy or otherwise of any information, scores or views published, and any direct or indirect losses are expressly disclaimed.

963 thoughts on “Who are the most solid lenders on Mintos? Our Mintos lender ratings

  1. Christian Reply

    As of today, all outstanding payments from ID Finance Mexico have been covered, and they have been removed from the Statistics table already. So these 3.2M from a few months before have been paid as announced. Let’s also share some facts related to good news every once in a while :). No idea whether they paid the interest on the pending payments already, however.

  2. Pingback: 🔥 Mintos Review - My Results After Investing €150,000

  3. Jmn Reply

    >>Sun Finance Latvia, Reporting Period: Dec 2019
    Shouldn’t this be: Sep 2020 ?

  4. NewInvestor Reply

    Hallo
    I must say that I really enjoy this site and the community, and the work put into this. Both from you guys who made this site, and the comments from readers. I spend almost the same amount of time reading the comments as I do browsing on this homepage. I do not have a financial education and there for the discussion in the comments threat helps put things in perspective.

    A big Thumbs up to the community from a new investor!

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      You are welcome! There are definitely many people with good knowledge and interesting views here in the comments section.

  5. Christian Reply

    Hi! Your statement “Mintos has now announced that 100% of the ID Finance loans on Mintos (€2.1m) are classified as pending payments. This is not going to end well.” should be updated, less than 600k remaining, which will be paid soon also I guess. I personally never saw that money at real risk, ID Finance has a good standing, but let’s see if it ends without losses indeed.

    • Gian Piero Reply

      The point is also that IDFinance by overusing the pending payments system found a way for many days of financing 2 million at zero interest. I never invest again in LOs that hold my money without paying interest.

      • Christian Reply

        Not true, they are supposed to pay the interest on the pending payments with a factor of 1.2 after day 11, which more than compensates the 0 interest on the first 11 days. Whether this has been paid already, not sure, I was not invested in them. Irrespective of this, I agree that everybody should be happy to have been received back or soon receive back all capital.

  6. Pingback: 2020 Gegužės-gruodžio atnaujinimas (2021-01-04) – FI-tech

  7. Pingback: Mintos: recenze největšího evropského P2P tržiště po 3,5 letech investování • P2Ptrh.cz

  8. Sam Reply

    According page mogo has 203milj,27,1milj equity and last lost 9,9milj. Explore p2p has ranked 53 of Mogo. Loans of mogo are typically car loans. Is the equity bigger (also in other car loan companies) if you think the way that mogo owns cars untill borrow has paid them back. Other way explaining loans are quarantee with car equity and equity loosing / negative profit has happened only because of currency weaking like you are written. Main business is still working perfect?

    • Donny Reply

      You shouldn’t consider the collateral (cars) as equity, but it is secured loans (like car loans) are indeed more safe than unsecured loans (like personal loans) yes.

  9. Lillo Reply

    Salve,
    per quanto riguarda Credistar, essendo anch’io un investitore su mintos, ho chiesto delucidazioni alla loro assistenza riguardo l’aumento dei pending payments di Credistar. Sono su Mintos da circa 9 mesi e sin dall’inizio ho investito parte del mio portafoglio su Credistar reputandolo un buon LO sulla scorta delle valutazioni lette su questo sito e con un ottimo rapporto rischio/tasso d’interesse offerto.
    Bene, la risposta fornitami dall’assistenza è arrivata velocissima ed in chat in real time. Per quanto fosse strutturata credo che l’operatore l’avesse già pronta, segno del fatto che sicuramente non fossi stato l’unico a chiedere delucidazioni su Credistar.
    In sintesi l’operatore mi ha risposto che Credistar sta soffrendo finanziariamente a causa di un disallineamento dei propri flussi di cassa dovuti ai sostanziosi rinnovi sui tempi di rientro dei prestiti offerti ai mutuatari e siccome Mintos concede una proroga sui tempi di rientro al massimo di 180 giorni mentre Credistar ha dovuto concedere dei tempi di dilazione superiori questo sta causando una sofferenza finanziaria a suo dire temporanea e che nell’arco di due settimante Credistar sarà in grado di rientrare interamente dei pending payments accumulati.
    Non ho idea se questo corrisponda al vero ma sta di fatto che i tempi di pagamento dei “pending payments” sono passati da 2 a 8 giorni di media e questo lo reputo effettivamente preoccupante. Spero possa essere stato di aiuto e confido che se qualcuno abbia maggiori informazioni li condivida con noi.
    Saluti.

  10. Folkert Reply

    Thanks for the update guys. Could you also comment on creditstar? The negative comments of investors and some bloggers make me worry, but both Mintos and yourself give consistently good ratings. Nothing to worry about then?

    • Gian Piero D'Amico Reply

      Creditstar at Mintos has the continuous problem of late, extended, pending payment Polish and Spanish loans. Much has been commented on this since in the last 9 months. The main point is that somehow other LOs in these markets do also have late payments or some extended loans, but not as bad as Creditstar. The legitimate question is why Creditstar seems to be doing less well than similar LOs? More worringly is that in the past few days withdrawals are not functioning as they should at Lendermarket. Their rule for a SEPA withdrawal is 1 to 3 business days. You would think that it is in Creditstar’s overriding interest to avoid also worrying its Lendermarket investors. Many run away from Creditstar at Mintos and were acquired paying generous bonuses during the autumn of 2020. They are now offering short term Polish loans at 16,60%. It is very improbable that this offer will attract anybody that has blocked withdrawals. You can find comments on this on the Lendermarket pages at Telegram. And yes, also I would value a comment from Oscar on Creditstar and Lendermarket.

  11. Pingback: Mintos: ¿en qué originadores invierto? – invertir mis ahorros

  12. Pingback: Crowdlending: ¿cómo decido en qué plataformas invierto? – invertir mis ahorros

  13. Pingback: Mintos: actualización 06/11/20 – invertir mis ahorros

  14. Segly Reply

    Hello,

    Do you share your full methodology on these ratings?

    Just got some questions after some research.
    For example, ESTO disclosure quality is rated 16/20 and track record 12/20.

    It’s disclosure quality is rated the same as Mogo, and way higher than AgroCredit (9/20). But personally found this to be quite off the tracks.
    Even plain & simple AgroCredit FS contains information about aging structure of the loans, impairment by buckets, movement of portfolio etc.
    Not even comparing with Mogo detailed FS.
    Is it something to be related to the fact that you ask additional information of every LO personally?
    Otherwise, from publicly available FS, seems rather strange.

    Track record is even lower compared to Mogo – 12 vs 10, how has this been measured?
    ESTO is very new LO (being from 2017) and just in 2019 has reached its profit, while Mogo is from 2012 with steady profits throughout the years and experience in the field.

    Thanks!

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Good questions. The reason we have been giving Esto good disclosure quality scores is that they have been one of the few LO’s to provide not only annual reports audited by a Big 4 firm, but also until recently monthly management accounts (now quarterly). The reason they don’t get full marks is for some of the points you raised (lack of portfolio metrics etc). Agrocredit only provides information once a year, which is why it does not have a good disclosure score. Mogo’s track record score has been cut significantly recently due to the significant deterioration in performance during 2020, some questionable acquisitions, and other factors.

  15. MK Investor Reply

    Your work has saved and made me money. Is there a way to say thank you besides just writing it? I’ll definitely buy you a virtual beer via PayPal or something like that, if that ever becomes an option.

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Thanks MK. We’ve had a few requests like this, and we will consider setting something up in future, but for now, just glad to hear the positive feedback, thanks for letting us know!

  16. Pingback: Actualización de cartera Noviembre 2020 - Inversor Millennial

  17. naigoreip Reply

    Thank you Oscar for your great work. I think downgrading Mogo is both courageous and very fair. The consequence is that If one wants to stick to selecting only the 60+ ratings there is not much left to do in Mintos. If like me one has Lendermarket and Moncera accounts, and one does not want Turkish, African or Bielorussian risk there are perhaps 3 or 4 acceptable LOs left in Mintos. Where is Mintos going to find quality growth?

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Thank you. Yes it is surprising that Mintos has not been able to bring in some higher quality LO’s in the last 12-18 months. There’s definitely appetite out there for high quality LO’s, even if the returns are sub-10%. 6-8% yield on high quality loans is much better than 12% where there’s a high risk of default…

  18. Mike Reply

    The Dineo Credito financials (2019) are now available via https://www.mintos.com/en/loan-originators/dineo_credito/#general.

    In general looking like the amount LOs with 60+ score is getting a bit low. If you were to invest in only better countries and LOs but wanting of course to have also enough diversity, would e.g. country risk score 50+ and LO score 55+ work?
    Yes – depends on the appetite for risk and all that and there’s no single answer fitting to all. Still? 😉

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Hi Mike. We can’t really say what the right cutoff should be for anyone. But now is as good a time as ever to allocate funds across different sites, particularly ones that have real estate collateral like Estateguru, Bulkestate, Crowdestate. The risk/reward is much better than buying loans of risky Mintos LO’s.

  19. Sergey Reply

    On Stik, “The profit after tax looks good, but more than 90% of it comes from tax credits.” Where do you see that / for what period / what numbers exactly? If i look at 1H20 #s, there’s an income tax of 128k eur, which reduces profit down to 1.157m eur. Likewise in FY19, income tax was PAID out, and in FY18 too. Tax items on balance sheet are insignificant. Even looking at their audited accounts in Bulgarian, I see no funny business from taxes?

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Sergey we were referring to the 2019 results they published on Mintos where they declared a PBT of 184k and a PAT of 1652k.

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Sergey upon further investigation we can see that they have made an error in the presentation of their P&L in the document they uploaded to Mintos, based on other filings we have reviewed. We have amended the score and noted the error in the comments. Thanks for flagging this.

        • Jc Reply

          Thank you so much for your work.

          Creditstar is such s strange beast – Lendermarket had almost everything on time. I managed to exit a month and a half.
          On Mintos it is now more than 6 months since I disabled all strategies with next to no profit and everything with delays and postpones. P2p is a No for me in the current climate.

  20. Marek Reply

    In August rating changes you reported that Creditstar has published its results for 1H 2020. Where these can be found?

  21. Joliehuis Reply

    You have Creditstar at a relatively high rating. Do you take into account that the short-term loans in Spain and Poland behave very differently than the personal loans elsewhere? Spain and Poland rank 5 in the new Mintos Risk Score, and all of their loans are late. Moreover, no new loans are available on the primary market on Mintos.

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Creditstar are clearly shifting their funding towards Lendermarket, so it’s not surprising that there are not too many loans available on Mintos any more. Yes Spain and Poland are higher risk countries at the moment, but overall results so far have been fairly good so far this year. Looking forward to seeing the Q3 update.

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Hi Adam. I think we have already uploaded that data. Perhaps try clearing your cache and see if the latest numbers appear? Let us know.

      • Adam Kadmon Reply

        Thanks for the reply Oscar;
        I’ve tried clearing cache and cookies but I still see a X in the Audited? section, but maybe it’s just my pc.

        • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

          Hi Adam – understood, we thought you were referring to the figures not the audit flag. Thanks, we have updated it.

  22. Thomas Reply

    With the currency the way it is at the moment, what are your thoughts on Wowwo at the moment?

    I have noticed that they have a new presentation on their LO page but no Q3 financials as yet. They dont seem to have a large proportion of late payments or any pending payments, which indicates that they are making their repayments on a timely basis. Does this mean that the FX is not a huge problem for them at the moment?

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Good question Thomas. We’d like to see better disclosure on how much of their funding is in euros and whether they hedge this in any way. But we should also note that depreciation of the lira is not a new thing, and they have been reporting good results in prior years during early depreciation periods too…They also own a lot of cars, which they say have appreciated in Lira terms by 50% so far this year. The ownership of hard assets like vehicles is probably a very good hedge of their euro funding exposure.

      • Thomas Reply

        It seems that Mintos finally uploaded the Wowwo 2019 audited accounts (not sure why they werent available previously!?)

        Just waiting for the Q3 financials now to see what effect the exchange rate has had on them.

        • Thomas Reply

          I know you werent happy with the audited accounts but the Wowwo Q3 financials look very healthy regardless of the pandemic and the change in exchange rates. Looks like they are able to absorb quite large increases in exchange rates, which is a good sign for the future.

  23. Pingback: Nástroj - tabulka ratingu poskytovatelů na Mintos • P2Ptrh.cz

  24. Gudrune Reply

    Hi, I went through Iute’s results for 3Q20, they’re very good given the circumstances, and the quality of their reporting might be the best of the competitors, or thereabouts. Their bonds are also “real” ones, in that they’re listed on Frankfurt Stock Exchange as eurobond (better than local market bonds like Delfingroup, for eg).

    Does anyone have contact information at Dozarplati? I have Qs on their financials but Mintos is of course useless and I can’t find an email address?

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Agree, they are doing great, and seem well managed. The main risk is that they are operating in places like Moldova and Albania which are emerging markets.

  25. Centrino Reply

    Hello,
    On 25/10, I’ve seen a link on a Telegram group about a possible new regulation in Latvia, unfortunately not in english :
    https://www.vz.lt/finansai-apskaita/2020/10/25/latvijoje-sprendziama-del-ne-didesniu-nei-5000-eur-skolu-gyventojams-nurasymo?fbclid=IwAR24YugNoXm3el3wjUDtLYVeDJwCDPh1_T_Ysinx9-UeZO3SdZQa_31qGZQ

    The persons in the group were wondering if this could affect Delfin Group, and if they should remove them from their anti-invest.

    Are you aware of this ?

    Thank you and regards

    • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

      Hi Centrino, we will try and get a response from Delfin Group on this question

        • Oscar Harrington Post authorReply

          We have received back a comment from the Delfin CFO. Apparently the law being discussed would require borrowers to prove to officials that they have no income and no assets. Does not sound that different to the insolvency procedures in many European countries. Worth monitoring but it seems that most borrowers in this position would have defaulted on their loans anyway, perhaps the recoveries on defaulted loans may fall slightly in some cases….

  26. Pingback: P2P-Anlage.de » Mintos-Analyse: Auswirkungen der Corona Krise auf Kreditgeber bei Mintos (10/2020)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *