Last updated - 10 April 2023
Mintos lenders can default or close down - choosing the best lenders is important
In 2017, Mintos lender Eurocent failed, and defaulted on its Mintos ‘buyback guarantee’ commitments. Since then there have been defaults and issues with several other lenders. Over the last 5 years we have been providing the scores and data on this page – our Mintos lender ratings. Our goal is to provide investors with key information on each lender, and a rating score to help highlight those that are lowest and highest risk.
To begin with, below we discuss some recent events:
Withholding taxes reduced from 20% to 5% - check your account status
One of the impacts of Mintos moving to a regulated notes structure was that it had to levy withholding taxes at source. This was one of the biggest downsides that we noted when in our post about the changes.
In welcome news, Mintos has announced that it has been able to reduce the withholding tax rate from 20% to 5% for EU and EEA residents. If you qualify, it is important that you make sure that you have provided any information that Mintos require to set you up on the 5% rate, and check that it is activated.
Why is the reduction good for investors? Some investors may have an effective tax rate below the 20% level, and this withholding tax deduction may reduce the amount of tax they pay overall. Even if you pay high rates of tax – the move is beneficial. That’s because more of the interest earned can get reinvested throughout any tax year, leading to higher interest income being earned after tax.
Mintos updates its ratings
Mintos has tweaked its ratings. The changes are not particularly significant – the scores are now provided with a decimal place. We have updated our tables below with the new decimal ratings. We did not observe any material rating changes to what was previously published.
Mintos finally launches its Notes program. Forced to close secondary market
After several delays Mintos has announced that it has launched its notes program. The notes program is designed to replace the current arrangement where it sells participations in loans, and is linked to its move to become a licenced investment platform. Initially there will be 3 companies issuing notes – CashCredit, Eleving and Sun Finance Latvia. While Mintos is highlighting some benefits to investors from notes relating to protections and transparency, there seem to be several downsides. One topic that has understandably upset many investors is the imposition of withholding taxes on interest earnings for the first time. We plan to write a post that discusses this in more detail shortly. Another huge downside relates to the secondary market – Mintos is being forced to close the secondary market in claims by 30 June. While a secondary market in notes will be possible, cutting off the liquidity options for over €670 million of claims that are currently outstanding is a huge negative. We hope Mintos makes investors more aware of the situation as this detail appears to have been lost in their communications.
Check out our new post that discusses the implications for investors of the new Mintos notes scheme – the key benefits, and 4 important downsides to be aware of.
Key financial information of each Mintos lender
The table below captures the key financial information for each lender. This can be useful to quickly lookup the profile of each lender, and compare the strengths and weaknesses of each one.
All Figures in EUR million (profits annualised where appropriate):
Loan originator | Reporting period | Loans | Equity | Profit - latest | Profit - prior year | Profit - 2 years prior | Audited? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eleving (Mogo) | Dec 2022 | 289 | 54 | 20.3 | 7.1 | 1.6 | ✔ |
IDF Eurasia Kazakhstan | Dec 2021 | 130 | 28.7 | 9.3 | 6.0 | 2.4 | ✔ |
Creditstar | Dec 2022 | 217 | 48.7 | 8.9 | 7.1 | 3.0 | ✔ |
Capital Service (D) | Dec 2021 | 18.7 | 1.7 | 3.6 | -3.8 | 0 | X |
Credifiel | Dec 2021 | 15.1 | 24.4 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.5 | ✔ |
IuteCredit | Dec 2022 | 194 | 56 | 6.1 | 5.2 | 8.1 | ✔ |
ExpressCredit (D) | Dec 2020 | 20.9 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 1.4 | -1.6 | ✔ |
DelfinGroup | Dec 2022 | 67.4 | 18 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 4.1 | ✔ |
GoCredit | Dec 2021 | 10.3 | 8.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.32 | ✔ |
LF Tech | Dec 2021 | 37.8 | 14.1 | 9.6 | 4.3 | ✔ | |
Jet Finance | Jun 2021 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.1 | -1.9 | -1.2 | ✔ |
Financiera Contigo / CEGE | Dec 2021 | 74.3 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 1.4 | -3.6 | ✔ |
Conmigo Vales / CEGE | Dec 2021 | 74.3 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 1.4 | -3.6 | ✔ |
ID Finance Mexico | Jun 2021 | 12.7 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 1.4 | -2.2 | ✔ |
Watu Credit Uganda | Dec 2021 | 15.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 | -0.4 | ✔ | |
Capem | Jun 2021 | 28.2 | 12.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | ✔ |
Alivio | Dec 2021 | 11.1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ✔ |
Finko Dinero (D) | Dec 2019 | 11.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | -1.5 | ✔ | |
Finko UkrPozyka (D) | Dec 2019 | 5.0 | 1.0 | -1.7 | ✔ | ||
SOS Credit (S) | Sep 2020 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | X |
Planet42 | Jun 2022 | 45 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 0.1 | -0.3 | X |
DanaRupiah | Dec 2021 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | ✔ |
Monego (D) | Dec 2018 | 4.1 | 0.4 | -0.6 | 0 | ✔ | |
Cashwagon (D) | Feb 2020 | 27.9 | 1.0 | -5.9 | -7.0 | ✔ | |
Placet Group | Sep 2022 | 56.8 | 29.4 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 3.7 | ✔ |
Fenchurch Legal | May 2021 | 10.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | X | ||
Wowwo (S) | Sep 2021 | 24.9 | 23.7 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 | ✔ |
Evergreen | Dec 2021 | 19.3 | 5.7 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | X |
Creamfinance | Dec 2021 | 35.0 | 14.7 | 3.4 | -0.8 | 0.9 | ✔ |
Extra Finance | Dec 2018 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | X |
Mozipo Group | Dec 2021 | 5.5 | 2.5 | -0.2 | -0.3 | 0.3 | ✔ |
Finitera Kredo | Dec 2019 | 10.6 | 0.2 | -1.2 | -0.8 | -0.2 | ✔ |
Creditter (S) | Dec 2020 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | ✔ | |
Revo Technology (S) | Sep 2020 | 23 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | -1.2 | ✔ |
Dozarplati (S) | Sep 2020 | 22.5 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | X |
EcoFinance (S) | Dec 2020 | 6.1 | 2.4 | -1.8 | -0.3 | 0.1 | ✔ |
GFM (S) | Dec 2021 | 9.9 | 7.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | X | |
Dinerito | Sep 2022 | 20.9 | 4.7 | 0.5 | -0.1 | 0.3 | ✔ |
Hipocredit | Dec 2020 | 7.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | ✔ |
Debifo | Dec 2018 | 7.8 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | X |
Kviku (S) | Dec 2021 | 83.3 | 13.9 | 10.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | X |
Rapido (D) | Dec 2018 | 1.8 | -1.7 | -1.7 | -1.9 | -0.8 | ✔ |
Peachy (D) | Dec 2018 | 5.7 | -1.4 | -0.4 | -2 | ✔ | |
GetBucks (D) | Jun 2019 | 92.1 | -41.8 | -51.2 | -9.5 | -12 | ✔ |
Finclusion | Dec 2021 | 16.7 | 12.4 | 0.4 | -0.8 | ✔ | |
Credius | Dec 2020 | 10.0 | 10.3 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | ✔ |
Rapicredit | Dec 2021 | 9.6 | 2.1 | 0.4 | -0.6 | 0.5 | ✔ |
Watu Credit | Dec 2021 | 27.9 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 0.2 | ✔ |
Sun Finance Latvia | Dec 2021 | 14.4 | 13 | 7.7 | 6.9 | 3.1 | X |
Everest Finanse | Dec 2022 | 105.4 | 69.2 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 2.2 | ✔ |
Sun Finance Poland (Ducatos) | Dec 2021 | 12.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | ✔ | |
Sun Finance Poland (Primastar) | Dec 2021 | 9.2 | -2.4 | -0.4 | -1.5 | ✔ | |
Sun Finance Group | Dec 2021 | 155 | 49 | 42.8 | 51 | 22 | ✔ |
E-Cash (D) | Dec 2019 | 2.3 | 0.6 | -1.3 | -0.6 | X | |
Esto | Dec 2021 | 32.5 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 | ✔ |
Zenka | Dec 2021 | 7.3 | 3.7 | 3.0 | -3.1 | -1.0 | ✔ |
Mikro Kapital Russia (S) | Dec 2020 | 17.7 | 7.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | -0.3 | ✔ |
Mikro Kapital Romania | Dec 2020 | 25.6 | 5.7 | 0.3 | -0.4 | ✔ | |
Mikro Kapital Uzbekistan | Dec 2020 | 8.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | -0.3 | ✔ | |
Mikro Kapital Belarus | Sep 2020 | 31.1 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 0.8 | ✔ | |
Mikro Kapital Moldova | Dec 2020 | 16.3 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | ✔ |
Fireof | Dec 2018 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | X | ||
ID Finance Spain | Jun 2022 | 60.4 | 17 | 10 | 10.5 | 2.5 | ✔ |
Lime Zaim (S) | Jun 2021 | 13.9 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | ✔ |
Dineo Credito | Dec 2021 | 7.4 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 2.2 | ✔ |
Dziesiątka Finanse (S) | Dec 2019 | 9.5 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | ✔ |
Novaloans | May 2021 | 5.0 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | ✔ |
Swell | Dec 2021 | 8.4 | 3.9 | 0.3 | -1.5 | 0.0 | X |
Alex Credit (D) | Mar 2019 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | -0.3 | X | |
CashCredit | Dec 2021 | 5.8 | 2.9 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | ✔ |
Note: S = Suspended D= Defaulted W = Solvent windown
Our Mintos lender ratings
Our Mintos lender ratings are based on 5 characteristics – profitability, capitalisation, size, track record and the quality of their reporting. We have allocated marks out of 20 for each metric, giving a total score out of 100. Mintos have recently changed their ratings system, which is now a number from 0-10. A W/D indicates that Mintos has withdrawn their rating.
Lender | Status | Profit | Capital | Size | Disclosure quality | Track record | Score / 100 | Last score change | Mintos score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eleving (Mogo) | Active | 14 | 7 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 68 | 0 | 7.8-8.6 |
IDF Eurasia Kazakhstan | Active | 14 | 5 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 51 | -12 | 6.5-6.6 |
Placet Group | Active | 16 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 81 | +2 | 7.8-8.1 |
Planet42 | Active | 11 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 56 | +4 | 7.4 |
Creditstar | Active | 12 | 6 | 17 | 11 | 8 | 54 | 0 | 5.5-6.1 |
IuteCredit | Active | 15 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 77 | +2 | 7.4 |
ExpressCredit Botswana | Active | 9 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 30 | -3 | 6.7 |
GoCredit | Active | 13 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 66 | 0 | 6.9 |
LF Tech | Active | 14 | 13 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 56 | +8 | 5.8 |
ID Finance Mexico | Active | 7 | 4 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 33 | -15 | W/D |
Watu Credit Uganda | Active | 13 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 48 | +7 | 7.1 |
Capem | Active | 12 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 65 | 7.8 | |
Jet Finance | Active | 8 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 42 | 7.4 | |
Alivio | Active | 7 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 48 | 0 | W/D |
Financiera Contigo / CEGE | Active | 13 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 63 | 5.7 | |
Conmigo Vales / CEGE | Active | 11 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 50 | 0 | W/D |
DelfinGroup | Active | 17 | 16 | 14 | 18 | 17 | 82 | 0 | 7.9 |
SOS Credit | Suspended | 6 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 38 | -8 | W/D |
Credifiel | Active | 12 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 67 | 7.4 | |
Creamfinance | Active | 14 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 68 | +6 | W/D |
Revo Technology | Suspended | 11 | 10 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 59 | -2 | W/D |
Extra Finance | Active | 12 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 47 | -5 | W/D |
Mozipo Group | Active | 4 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 35 | 0 | 7.4-7.5 |
Wowwo | Defaulted | 12 | 13 | 13 | 7 | 14 | 59 | 0 | W/D |
Fenchurch Legal | Defaulted | 8 | 9 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 42 | W/D | |
Rapicredit | Active | 4 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 38 | -7 | 6.4 |
Evergreen | Active | 14 | 9 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 49 | 0 | 7.2 |
Dozarplati | Suspended | 14 | 11 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 56 | +11 | W/D |
Creditter | Suspended | 12 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 47 | +14 | W/D |
Sun Finance Poland (Ducatos) | Active | 12 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 48 | +7 | 6.8 |
Sun Finance Poland (Primastar) | Active | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 19 | 6.8 | |
EcoFinance | Suspended | 5 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 40 | +6 | W/D |
GFM | Active | 10 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 46 | 0 | 6.5 |
Hipocredit | Active | 8 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 41 | 0 | 7.4 |
Debifo | Active | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 22 | -10 | W/D |
Finclusion | Active | 10 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 51 | +16 | 6.4-7.0 |
Sun Finance Group | Active | 18 | 10 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 69 | 6.7-7.2 | |
Lime Zaim | Suspended | 11 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 60 | +8 | W/D |
Fireof | Active | 7 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 29 | -14 | W/D |
E-cash | Suspended | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 20 | -3 | W/D |
DanaRupiah | Active | 6 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 28 | 0 | 5.6 |
Sun Finance Latvia | Active | 17 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 13 | 64 | +9 | 6.6 |
Credius | Active | 14 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 71 | +3 | 7.8 |
Esto | Active | 13 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 13 | 65 | 0 | 7.8 |
Dinerito | Active | 10 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 55 | 0 | 6.4 |
Zenka | Active | 12 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 47 | +21 | 5.9 |
Mikro Kapital Russia | Suspended | 8 | 13 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 53 | 0 | W/D |
Mikro Kapital Romania | Active | 9 | 10 | 13 | 8 | 9 | 49 | +6 | 7.9 |
Mikro Kapital Belarus | Active | 13 | 6 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 54 | -9 | W/D |
Mikro Kapital Uzbekistan | Active | 11 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 43 | 0 | 7.5 |
Mikro Kapital Moldova | Active | 8 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 51 | -3 | 8.0 |
Kviku (Score W/D) | Suspended | 00 | W/D | ||||||
ID Finance Spain | Active | 15 | 8 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 53 | -14 | 6.4 |
Dziesiątka Finanse | Suspended | 6 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 52 | +9 | W/D |
Swell | Active | 11 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 51 | +8 | 7.5 |
Everest Finanse | Active | 8 | 18 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 65 | +5 | 6.9 |
CashCredit | Active | 7 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 45 | -12 | 6.9 |
Novaloans | Active | 11 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 51 | 0 | 6.7 |
Consider country risk too
Mintos offers loans from many different countries around the world, and some countries are more risky than others. To help investors assess the risk level of each country, we have published a country risk ratings page. This takes into account factors such as currency risks, sovereign risk and the local business environment. We think it is worth considering these risks when building a portfolio allocation, in addition to the LO ratings above.
Key updates: March / April 2023
Score retained: Eleving
Eleving (formerly Mogo) has announced strong results for 2022. Profits have more than doubled to €20m, and the company grew its lending portfolio by 18%. This is fairly high but not too fast to make us worried. Our rating score remains 68. We still believe that the weakness of Eleving is its high leverage. It is one of the few lenders that appear on Mintos that have a credit rating. However that credit rating is unfortunately very weak (Fitch, B-). This weakness is due to the high leverage, and other reasons such as the countries that it operates in.
Dinerito
Dinerito has a business model that we really like. It lends to Mexican borrowers and collects the repayments directly from their salary payments. This type of lending is much lower risk than the normal 'payday' style loans that appear on the Mintos marketplace. The downside of this type of lending is that it has lower interest rates and it can be harder to make profits. Dinerito was on track to make almost €1m for 2022 (based on its latest Q3 2022 financials) and has a reasonable funding structure. We have increased our score by 6 to 55.
Everest
Everest Finanse are a large Polish consumer finance company, with more than 100,000 customers. Their presentations and financial data are usually low quality. However, they are a business that has been profitable for 5 years and are backed by credible investors. While many lenders appearing in Mintos are under-capitalised, that is definitely not the case with Everest. They have too much equity if anything. That leaves them with a low return on their equity, but if you are a Mintos lender, that's not your problem... Our score is up 5 to 65.
Iute Credit
We really wish all the lenders on Mintos provided financial information that was as as regular, and high quality, as provided by Iute Credit. Perhaps they are keen to report regularly because their results tend to be very consistent, and strong. For 2022, their (unaudited) profits were €6.1m, up from €5.2m in 2021. Iute Credit has been one of our highest rated lenders for many years - the biggest issue has been finding loans that are available and offer a decent interest rate. Our new score is up 2 to 77.
Planet42
We have always loved the business model of Planet42. It operates in South Africa, and provides loans to help the under-banked community get access to vehicles. This allows them to earn an income, and Planet42 retains ownership of the vehicle until the loan is repaid. That being said, South Africa is a higher risk country to operate in, and the company has less equity capital than we would like to see. In the first half of 2022, which are the most recent resutls available, the company made a profit of €0.7m. That's a great result for a small but growing business. To reflect this growth in profitability, we have increased our score by 4 to 56.
Comment: Creditstar
Creditstar had promised to clear its 'pending payment' debts to Mintos investors by the end of March, as it expected to be able to raise funding from various sources. They have made some progress in reducing the amount of pending amounts owed by around half, but there are still over €4m of overdue payments outstanding. It is quite surprising how difficult the company has found it to raise funds. Creditstar has announced (unaudited) profits of almost €9m for 2022, and shareholders equity of €49m. Something doesn't quite add up. Our score remains 54, and we will remain cautious about Creditstar until it is able to demonstrate a stronger funding situation, and/or hire a better finance team, regardless of how much profits it reports.
Farewell to...
Podemos Progresar Mintos love to make big announcements about new lenders but the ones that leave tend to quietly exit. Podemos Progresar is a small Mexican lender that focused on lending to low income women. No issues with the company have been announced by Mintos, so either the company was able to find cheaper sources of funding, or Mintos just decided that they were no longer welcome on the site.
Other companies with scores retained
Following a review of their latest financial statements and management presentations, the following companies had no changes to their existing scores: GFM, ID Finance Spain, Delfin Group, Creditstar
Key updates: January/ February 2023
Comment: Creditstar
Creditstar is an important Mintos lender that has been running a large 'pending payment' position (i.e in default on its obligations to investors). It had previously promised to cover its €8.3m pending payment position by the end of 2022 via a bond issue, but that has not happened. Mintos now says that Creditstar is in the process of obtaining €10-15m of liquidity from a new investor, which will allow it to cover the pending payments. What Creditstar really seems to need is a large injection of equity, which would provide it with permanent liquidity and increase confidence in its financial position. It is unclear why it hasn't been able to do this, give the strong profits it has reported over the last few years. For now, investors should remain cautious.
Comment: ID Finance companies
ID Finance has 3 businesses that borrow from the Mintos platform located in Kazakhstan, Spain and Mexico. Their investor relations team send monthly emails saying how well the businesses are all doing, and growing quickly. The reality however is that each business have had large pending payment positions for some time, and the quality of financial information provided by each company is usually very poor. Fitch Ratings highlighted that ID Finance Spain chose to make a large dividend payment in 2022, shortly before running short of liquidity. That's a sign of a poorly run business. Both Mintos and ID Finance claim that the companies will raise new equity and debt during Q1 2023, which will reduce the amount of pending payments. We hope they are able to do so, but there has to be significant doubts that all the liquidity issues will be resolved during the next two months.
Key updates: December 2022
Delfin Group
Delfin Group has been one of our highest rated loan originators for many years and there were no surprises in their Q3 2022 results. Delfin is on track to make a profit of €5.7m this year, and it has been consistently profitable for many years now. It has been growing its loan-book strongly this year after being quite conservative on lending during the Covid period. Delfin is listed and the company trades at a market cap of approximately €58m. Yes this is small, but it represents a value 240% higher than shareholders equity of the company - clearly shareholders like the high rates of profitability and outlook for the company. We have increased our score by 2 to 82.
Placet Group
Placet Group is another loan originator that has been achieving high scores for a long time. It has had very stable earnings and a sensible balance sheet structure. After many years of profits in the €3-4m range, it looks like Placet Group is going to break through into the €5m region this year based on their latest Q3 results. Balance sheet continues to be very solid with their assets being majority funded by equity. The biggest downside is that available supply (and interest rates) on Mintos are low. To buy loans we would recommend opening an account at Moncera, which is the P2P site operated by Placet. They recently released some new loans at a 10% yield, which is much higher than the 6% available at Mintos. Meanwhile, our score is up 2 to 81
Key updates: November 2022
Comment: Creditstar
In October we downgraded our score for Creditstar by 10 to 54 due to rising levels of 'pending payments' (see below). Since then the company has published Q3 financials which showed profits of €6.9m year to date. The company also notes that it plans to issue a new bond and also do an equity raise. It claims that it could cover the pending payments now but 'this would sacrifice growth and the targets we have set for this year'. This is a very strange statement to make publicly, as it makes the company appear more focused on their objectives than fulfilling their contractual obligations to P2P investors. The more likely reality however, is that until the company is able to issue their new bond, and raise additional equity, the company does not have sufficient liquidity on hand to make the payments required right now to cover the pending payments. We expect that the company will be able to issue bonds and raise new equity, but for now the risk remains higher than in the past for investors in Creditstar loans.
Eleving (Mogo)
Eleving has been having an exceptionally strong 2022 so far, driven by strong interest income growth. This has been achieved from a combination of portfolio growth and higher average yields. At the same time, interest costs have been flat, which has helped to generate a year to date profit of almost €18m. Credit quality also appears to be under control. Impairment losses and NPL ratios did increase during this year, but not more than could be expected given the difficult macro environment. Eleving has always had high levels of leverage, and this continues to be their biggest weakness when analysing their financial profile. However the company is now in a much stronger position than it was in two years ago, and our scores have been increasing to reflect this. Our latest score is up 2 to 68.
Note: Sun Finance
Sun Finance is one of the larger lending groups operating on Mintos. It operates in many countries globally. We have revisited our ratings approach because of changes to the group guarantee arrangements. We now provide a score for the group - 69, that applies to companies who receive this group guarantee. Sun Finance Latvia does not receive this guarantee and receives a score of 64. There are two Polish entities that also do not receive a guarantee. Ducatos (48) has a significantly higher score than its sister company Primastar (19) as Primastar is heavily loss making and has negative equity in its balance sheet.
ExpressCredit Namibia
ExpressCredit is a small lender based in Namibia. It has developed a high level of 'pending payments' in recent months which Mintos has attributed to legal and regulatory complications with the transition to the new notes format Mintos is using. While some complications could be expected with this transition, the high level of pending payments suggests that ExpressCredit is over-reliant on funding from Mintos and has limited alternative liquidity sources. It appears that the company may have re-lent the funds collected, rather than pass them to Mintos investors. Our latest score for ExpressCredit Namibia is 21
LF Tech
We have not increased our scores for many companies recently but the audited 2021 results for the company justified this. The company achieved a profit of €9.4m, which is impressive given that the size of the loan portfolio is only €37m. LF Tech is based in Kazakhstan, which is often considered a higher risk country but its economy has been performing well during 2022 due to strong oil and gas prices. Our score is up 8 to 56
Watu Credit
Watu Credit operates in Uganda. It provides motorcycle finance that then helps its borrowers to generate self employment income. After a loss in 2020, it achieved a profit of 1.2m in 2021. We would like to see it increase its level of capital however, as it is a more leveraged company than most lenders on Mintos. We do like the social benefit aspects of the company and hope it is successful. Our new score is up 7 to 48
Note: Capital Service
Thanks to our reader Filip who spotted that the 2021 financial statements for Capital Service had been published on a government website. Capital Service is currently in default and has been in discussions with Mintos over the terms that the amounts outstanding will be fully repaid. What can we learn from the financials? There are some positive aspects for creditors - the company made a profit of €3.6m in 2021, and now has a (small) positive equity position of €1.7m. The downside for investors is that the loan book was almost entirely being funded by Mintos investors. This heavy reliance on Mintos P2P funding could make it difficult to find a solution that quickly repays investors the funds they are owed.
Cash Credit
Cash Credit is a fairly standard payday lending company operating in Bulgaria. It seems to struggle with profitability - it tends to just about break even, with a small loss in 2021. It is also a small business, with a loan portfolio of only €6m. One positive is that it has a conservative balance sheet structure, with the equity of €2.9m providing a good level of cushion for investors. Our score fell 12 to 45.
Finclusion
The Finclusion group has a bit of a complicated history. It took over some lending operations from a holding company called MyBucks, who had 4 other operations (called GetBucks) that defaulted on their Mintos obligations. While those businesses seem to be in run-off, the Finclusion owned companies are doing better, making a small profit of €0.4m in 2021. The company has an impressive balance sheet structure, with equity of €12.4m funding a loan portfolio of €16.7m. The improvement in the company's profitability, and strong balance sheet led us to increase our score by 16 to 51
Companies with scores retained
Following a review of their latest financial statements and management presentations, the following companies had no changes to their existing scores: Alivio, DanaRupiah, Evergreen, Mozipo Group, Novaloans
Key updates: October 2022
Creditstar
During October, the 'pending payments' (or overdue payments) outstanding on Mintos has reached €8.9m. At the same time, it has been offering customers on its Lendermarket P2P site bonus offers of up to 3% to invest additional funds. It has committed to Mintos that it will cover all pending payments by the end of the year, and will pay investors an extremely high interest rate of 18% until this happens. It seems that Creditstar is finding it difficult to raise funds at the moment, potentially due to difficult conditions in the bond market where it has historically raised funds. It isn't clear how it will raise the needed funds - presumably this can partly be achieved by reducing the size of its loan portfolio. In the meantime we have reduced our score by 10 to 54 to reflect the increased risk level.
IDF Eurasia
IDF Eurasia is another Mintos loan originator that has published strong financial results, yet still seems to be having difficulty with its supply of funding. Its pending payments have reached €15.5m, an average delay of 135 days. This has been attributed to difficulties completing the sale of a new bond that would refinance Mintos investors. The company had committed to paying €11m by October 31 towards the outstanding pending payments but this does not seem to have been achieved by the company and is instead now paying the balance at the rate of €1m a week. We have reduced our score by 12 to 51 to reflect the increased risk level.
ID Finance Mexico
All of the amounts outstanding on Mintos from ID Finance Mexico have a pending payment status. The current amount outstanding in this category is €7.3m. This is very material as the total size of the loan portfolio was only €15.5m in its last financial statements. Mintos has asked the company to repay the funds by the end of the year and is charging interest at the rate of 17.6%. We would like to have received more information from Mintos about what the underlying situation is with this company. In the meantime our new score is down 15 to 33.
ID Finance Spain
ID Finance Spain also has high current levels of pending payments - just under €11m. Again the reason for this has not been explained adequately by them or Mintos - the company reported very strong profits of €10.5m during 2021. Its last fundraising valued the company at €220m. The company has committed to repay the pending payment amounts by the end of the year and pay 17.6% interest until it does. It is not clear what the sources of funding will be to achieve this. Our new score is down 14 to 53.
Key updates: August & September 2022
Eleving (Mogo)
Eleving is the largest lender on the Mintos platform. It announced excellent H1 2022 results, with a profit of €7.4m. Revenues increased by 47% over the same period in 2021. Credit quality remains fairly stable. The biggest concern is that Eleving has more financial leverage than most of the lenders on Mintos. Our score is up 4 to 66
Score retained: Creditstar
Creditstar is an important company in the P2P space and its results are followed closely. It has announced a profit of €3.5m for the first half of 2022. This is a stable profit level compared to its audited profits for 2021. Our score remains 64. To gain a higher score we would like to see Creditstar reduce its leverage ratio
Score retained: Delfin
Delfin has released its Q2 2022 results and they continue to be excellent, with a profit of €1.2m. Delfin receives high scores because of its strong and steady profit levels, a sensible balance sheet structure, excellent reporting and a long track record. Our score remains 80
Cash Credit
Cash Credit is a small Bulgarian lender. Since our last analysis they have increased their capital levels significantly, and also improved their balance sheet structure. Earnings have now been stable for 3 years straight. These positive developments have led us to increase the rating score by 8 to 57
Score retained: Esto
We have been pretty impressed with the small Estonian lender Esto. Since launching as a start up it reached profitability quickly. It has then grown its earnings over each of the last 4 years, reaching a profit of €3.3m in 2021. Our score remains 65
Everest
Polish lending firm Everest disclosed a large loss in Q1 2022. The financial report says that this was caused by a financial transaction the company executed but it did not provide sufficient information for us to analyse the situation properly. We have reduced the score by 9 to 60
Score retained: Placet
Placet Group is one of the highest quality lenders available for P2P investors to purchase loans from. It has a long history of steady profits, and a sensible balance sheet structure. It earned €1.8m in 1H 2022, right in line with expectations. Our score remains 79
Swell
When small Mexican lender joined Mintos it did not have much of a financial record, which is why it only received an initial score of 43. It managed to break into profit for the first time during 2021. It remains small however, and higher risk than many other lenders. Our score has increased by 8 to 51
Note: Wowwo
Wowwo is a Turkish motor dealer and finance company. It has defaulted on its Mintos obligations, which it blamed on losses caused by depreciation of the Turkish Lira against the Euro. In its most recent audited financial statements, the auditors stated that in some areas the company had not complied with accounting standards. The audited results were also significantly worse than the management accounts that had been provided to Mintos. In short, the situation has been a total mess, and the company has lost the confidence of investors. We were quite surprised to see that the company had uploaded management accounts for the period to Sep 2021. This shows quite a different picture, with a very strong equity position of €24m, and a run rate profit of €3.3m. The profit and equity position is very surprising given that the Lira depreciated by over 30% during this period. Since Sep 2021, the value of the Lira has almost halved again in value. This is not good news for Mintos investors, as the company has been running an unhedged FX position, and means that the likely recovery rate continues to fall.
Zenka
When Kenyan lender Zenka was launched on Mintos we gave it a very low rating of 26. That's because it was a tiny startup, loss making and had a negative shareholders equity balance. To give the company credit, it had a great 2021, making a profit of €3m. This, together with an equity injection has helped it plug its equity hole, which is now (positive) €3.7m. The company is now in a much better position than when they launched on Mintos, and our score is up 21 to 47
Note: Fenchurch
Mintos have announced that they will not list any new loans from British litigation financing firm Fenchurch, because its parent company has entered into insolvency. While the insolvency does not directly impact Fenchurch, we can understand why Mintos took this decision. Hopefully the parent company will receive an equity injection, or Fenchurch can be sold to a new owner. The risk for investors is that Fenchurch only has €0.5m of equity. This small equity buffer creates risks for investors if Fenchurch can't quickly find a new owner
Key updates: June & July 2022
Score retained: IDF Eurasia Kazakhstan
IDF Eurasia published its audited results for 2021. Profits were quite strong - up from €5.7m to €9.0m. While the company's finances are currently fine, there are of course significant political risks in the region Kakazkhstan sits. In particular there is a risk that Russia is able to block the country's oil exports, which account for 14% of GDP. Our score remains 63
ID Finance Spain
ID Finance Spain lends to the 'underbanked' population, which is another way of saying high risk borrowers. However their strategy is currently working, with profits in 2021 increasing significantly to €10.5m, from €2.5m the year before. While the company has reasonably high levels of non-performing loans, the interest it generates is sufficient to cover losses. The company's level of leverage is also reasonable. Our score is up 8 to 67
Score retained: Placet Group
Placet Group has now published its results for the second half of 2021 and first quarter of Q1 2022. The company has consistently generated profits of between €3-4m a year for many years now and that trend continued in 2021. The company continues to run with only modest leverage levels, and as a result has one of our highest scores for capitalisation levels. Our score remains 79
Score retained: Planet42
Planet42 is a South African company that leases cars. It launched on Mintos at the end of last year. The company's 2021 results were in line with expectations, based on the figures provided by management when they launched. While car financing is generally a lower risk lending activity, the company has quite a lot of leverage and is only at break-even profitability currently. Our score remains 52
Rapicredit
Rapicredit is a very small Columbian lending company, with a loan portfolio of below €10m. It's not particularly profitable, and doesn't score highly on any of our other metrics. To reflect the company becoming profitable in 2021, and some other improvements, our score increased by 10, to 45
Key updates: May 2022
New: Credifiel
New lender Credifiel specialises in payroll lending. It is based in Mexico and has been operating since 2005. Payroll lending has a lower risk than unsecured lending as the repayments are deducted from an employee's salary packet. This can be seen in the company's P&L, where they generate $3.50 in interest for every $1 of provision cost. Credefiel made a profit of €2.3m in 2021, and has had a consistent profit record since 2017. Overall though the business seems to be performing well and is solidly capitalised. Our initial score is 67
Creamfinance
Creamfinance has published its audited results for 2021 and unaudited results for Q1 22. The business is doing well, making a €3.4m profit in 2021 and doing even better in Q1 22. Prior to 2021 the business had had a fairly weak profit profile, which was the main reason its score was not as high as similar companies. Our score has increased 6 to 68, mainly due to the strengthening earnings of the company
Score retained: Delfin
Delfin has released its Q1 2022 results and they continue to be excellent, with a profit of €1.4m. The company ticks a lot of boxes - steady but growing profits, a sensible balance sheet structure, excellent investor reporting and a long track record. Our score remains 80
Sun Finance Latvia
Sun Finance Latvia has provided new financial information after a wait of almost 2 years. The results are very strong, with a profit of €7.7m for 2021, following a profit of €6.9m in 2020. The balance sheet shows that the loans are almost entirely funded with shareholders equity, and only a small balance from Mintos. Everything looks great - the only (and fairly large) concern is that the numbers are not audited and minimal other information has been provided. Our new score is up 9 to 65. It would be much higher if reporting improved
Note: Kviku
Kviku is a Russian lending group that was quickly suspended from the primary market by Mintos after the outbreak of the Ukraine war and related sanctions against Russia. Interestingly the results they have published for 2021 are extremely strong, with a profit of €10.8m and very strong asset growth. Kviku has been pretty quiet recently, with limited updates on the situation. Over 90% of listed loans now have a 'pending payment' status. This is caused by multiple restrictions preventing the wire of funds out of Russia. We have decided to remove our scores for Kviku until the situation changes
Eleving (Mogo)
Eleving is one of the largest and most important lenders on Mintos. It provides loans secured on second hand cars, mainly in Eastern Europe. It has now released its audited results for 2021. Profits were lower than shown in the previously provided management accounts - €7.1m vs €8.8m. Of this only €2.1m was attributable to the parent company, the rest was attributable to minority shareholders. Both of these factors have led us to reduce our profit score, as the underlying earnings of the parent company were lower than expected.The other continuing area of concern is the high level of leverage being run by Mintos. While the 'headline' shareholders equity figure of €31.3m may look OK, after deducting minority interests and intangible assets, the adjusted figure is only €10.2m. That is a low amount for a company with €322m of assets. Our adjusted score is down 6 to 62, to reflect the audited profit figure and the high balance sheet leverage.
Key updates: April 2022
New: Financiera Contigo
Mintos has announced that Mexican lender 'Financiera Contigo' has joined the platform. It's a brand name of a Mexican lending group called CEGE. CEGE has guaranteed the debts of another (small) lender that joined Mintos last year called Conmigo Vales. Conmigo Vales is not a subsidiary of CEGE but it has overlapping shareholders (known as a 'sister' company). Last year we gave Conmigo Vales a score of 50, noting that we had based our score on CEGE and discounted it because Conmigo Vales itself was very small and also
because a guarantee from a company is not as strong as a direct claim. Originally we understood that ‘Financiera Contigo’ was a sister company or subsidiary, but the Mintos team kindly reached out to us to explain that it is just a brand used by CEGE itself. Based on our review of the latest audited financials for CEGE, and their track record, we have assigned a score of 63 to Financiera Contigo / CEGE.
Score retained: GoCredit
GoCredit published its unaudited 2021 financials. They were in line with expectations, with a profit of €1.5m for the year, slightly up on 2020. The main strength of GoCredit is its strong balance sheet, with very low levels of leverage. It said that it had reduced its cost of funds during 2021 which will further make the business stronger. Our score remains 66
Key updates: March 2022
ID Finance Spain
ID Finance provided a webcast during March outlining its results for 2021. Things are going well, with a €10.5m made by its Spanish business during 2021. It recently raised equity on Crowdcube at a €220m valuation. They have not yet published full financials, but in the interim we have increased the score by 5 to 59, with potential for a further increase once we review the financial statements
Score retained: Iute Credit
Iute Credit announced a 2021 profit of €6.1m, in line with expectations. The company's loan portfolio is performing well, with lower provisioning cost %'s than in 2020. Our score remains 75
Farewell to...
Capitalia and Sun Finance Denmark . Capitalia had been active on Mintos for many years but like many other loan originators, it has now setup its own P2P site. We are not surprised to see Sun Finance Denmark leave, as new regulations have made it difficult to operate profitably in the country.
Farewell to...
Agrocredit and Pay PS . Both lenders seem to have left Mintos without any announcement. In the case of Pay PS that is a lucky thing, as it is a small Russian lender. Estonian lender Agrocredit had been on Mintos for many years but was also small.
Key updates: February 2022
New: Planet42
Planet42 calls itself a 'socially inclusive' car finance company. In practice that seems to mean lending to people in South Africa with thin or poor credit profiles at interest rates above 50%. Still, we think a business model like this could be successful. It has now reached break-even and is growing quickly. In December 2021, it raised $30m in funding. The figures provided do not include this funding, but we have considered it in our initial score, which is 52.
Delfin Group
Delfin Group successfully IPO'd on Nasdaq Riga during Q4 2021 which is a very positive achievement for the company. It raised over €8m and sensibly used the funds to buy back bonds with high coupons. The reporting quality of Delfin continues to be very good, and we expect this to continue now that it is a listed company. Delfin has announced (unaudited) profits of €4.2m for 2021. Our score is up 3 to 80.
Score retained: Eleving
Eleving (formerly Mogo) is one of the most important lending companies on Mintos. It has released its unaudited Q4 21 results. Eleving appears to have made a small loss in Q4 but the overall result for the year was still satisfactory - a profit of €8.8m. Our main concern continues to be that it is operating with high levels of leverage - it really needs more equity if it wants to continue to grow. Our score remains 68.
Creditstar
Creditstar has announced (unaudited) profits of €7.1m for 2021. In December it raised €3.9m of equity, and also issued €10.5m of bonds. These are all clearly positive milestones, and our score is up 3 to 64. Following our review of the 2020 annual report we remain concerned about some of Creditstar's accounting practices and our score reflects some adjustments we have made to reported equity values and profits.
Key updates: January 2022
Zenka
Zenka is a small lender based in Kenya. Its audited accounts for 2020 show a significant loss, and a negative equity position. Its latest management presentation says that the business has become profitable in 2021, and that it received an equity injection from shareholders so that it could repay Mintos lenders. Our score is down 20 to 26
Creditter
Creditter is another small lender. It is based in Russia. It has now been profitable in the both years that we have financial information available. It has quite a conservative balance sheet structure. Our score is up 14 to 47
Score retained: Esto
Esto is a mid-sized lender based in Estonia. It has developed a good track record now, with consistently growing profits. While at first look it seems a little under-capitalised, there is also €3m of subordinated debt that provides additional protection to Mintos lenders. Our score remains 65
Evergreen
Evergreen is a payday lending company based in the UK. It has a fairly good track record, generating profits of €0.9m in 2020 and 2019. We expect profits to have increased in 2021. Our score is up 3 to 49
Farewell to...
Pinjam Yuk and TasCredit Both of these companies appear to have been quietly removed from the platform without any announcement from Mintos. Pinjam Yuk ran into problems at the beginning of the Covid crisis. TasCredit is based in Kazakhstan which is currently experiencing significant internal political issues. Mintos investors have been fully repaid by both companies
Next step: consider adding these sites to your portfolio
All information published on ExploreP2P is subject to important disclaimers contained on our legal page here. No liability is accepted for the accuracy or otherwise of any information, scores or views published, and any direct or indirect losses are expressly disclaimed.
Pingback: ▷ 6 kroków, aby wybrać najlepszych inicjatorów pożyczek Mintos [For 2023]
Pingback: What are the best and worst P2P loans right now? #19 – InvFuture Education
Pingback: We've picked the best and worst P2P loans available right now
Thanks for the scores update but it seems you haven’t changed the numbers in the table (e.g. Everest is still 60)
Pingback: Zinseinbruch! Wo gibt es noch hohe P2P Zinsen >13%?
Pingback: New lenders are appearing on Lendermarket. Are they solid? Here's our Lendermarket lender ratings
Hello again. Thanks for all this info, super nice. I have a question though, I see that in the first table you have both “Watu Credit” and “Watu Credit Uganda”, but in the second table I see only “Watu Credit Uganda”. Why is that so?
Hello, fantastic job on all this info, thank you very much, but I don’t see Finitera Kredo in the second table. Was that a miss or intentional?
Thanks for good work,
Rui
Pingback: Pisikese portelli jaotus – Passiivne Tulu
Thanks again for all this information. Can you please add Evergreen Finance as well?
Best regards.
You should see them on the table Rui? Score is 49
Okay, I see it now, thank you. I was searching for the full name “Evergreen Finance”, and I see it’s abbreviated to “Evergreen only”.
Great work here in this blog, really. Thanks again.
Rui
Pingback: Mintos: ¿en qué originadores invierto? Versión 2023 - Invertir mis ahorros
Placet group has defaulted on some of their buyback guaranties (those based on Real Estate) on Moncera. While not directly related to Mintos, and not a bare default, this is surprising for such a strong Lender.
Creditstar won’t repay the 8.3M of pending payments scheduled for dec-2022 but five months later (may-2023).
https://www.mintos.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Pending-Payments-report_2022-23.12.2022.pdf
I’m not surprised at all, and don’t expect the payment to happen may-23 neither. At least if they continue to pay 18% apy+1% sweetener every 6 months, the interests would cover the capital in five years.
Lender scores from Mintos are now decimals https://www.mintos.com/blog/introducing-a-more-detailed-mintos-risk-score/ Can you update the table please?
Hi David, now updated.
Q3-2022 report from Creditstar is available.
They answer about the repayment they owe Mintos:
”’Mintos platform volume has decreased considerably this year due to the current conditions in the equity
and crypto markets. Moreover, the war in Ukraine is affecting the overall P2P marketplaces, especially
the Mintos platform. This resulted in rapidly increased pending payments in June and July.
Our credit lines work differently from the simple instalment loans that are dominant on the Mintos
platform – from a technical standpoint, the pending payments are quicker to increase if the platform
funding is low.
We have been proactively handling the situation by raising additional capital to cover the reduced
funding from the Mintos platform, limiting credit origination where needed and by providing our valued
Mintos investors with a higher yield of investments to compensate for any inconvenience.
We could repay all pending payments on the Mintos platform, but this would sacrifice growth and the
targets that were set for this year. Instead, we have agreed with the platform that pending payments
will be paid at year end when they will either be refinanced or the platform has restarted functioning
properly. This way, we can keep growing the business instead of decreasing our business.
All other sources of financing are performing well. We successfully issued 24 million Euros in Bond at the
beginning of June, where more than 75% of our bond investors opted for the longer period of the 36-
month bond tranche”’
Seems a very strange thing to say publicly – that you are going to prioritise growth and annual targets over paying your creditors on time….
There is an error: You say that Watu Credit score was raised to 45 but on the table it sits at 65
Thanks very much Trigueiro – very strange as our score has never been that high for them – now fixed.
Your write “Sun Finance Latvia does not receive this guarantee and receives a score of 64” but in the table it is listed with 55.
Also Mintos score for Eleving ranges in 7-9 not 7-8. Mogo IFN SA (Romania) has score 9.
Updated, thanks JMN
Thanks Osmium – the table did not get updated for that entity, now fixed.
Guys, thanks for the excellent work and keeping the scores updated!
As other people below, I would like to draw your attention to Creditstar and ID FInance, who partially stopped paying investors since July and have therefore accumulated significant amounts of pending payments. This clearly shows some liquidity issues and should be closely monitored and considered by investors. Personally, my pending payments from these lenders are constantly growing with the maturing of the underlying transactions and I have not seen any decrease in the total amount in the Mintos reports. Even though they have time until yearend to cover these payments, they do not seem to transfer any significant amounts to Mintos and is quite unclear how they will find EUR 8+ million (Creditstar) and EUR 18+ million (ID Finance) to repay.
Personally I would not invest in both until this situation is resolved. Looking forward to your opinion!
Creditstar resumed payments for new cashflows, actually locking PP to 8.3M. Still this is a lot of money to pay in two months. Maybe they plan to lower loans issuance (overall, not on Mintos) to increase their treasury?
Evergreen has published new reports
https://www.mintos.com/en/lending-companies/Evergreen
Thanks JMN – we have updated our comments today, and cut scores for Creditstar and also the ID Finance companies. Presumably all companies will be cutting the size of their loan books if they are having difficulty with raising new bonds.
Hi MV – completely agree with your comments – we have updated our commentary today and have significantly cut their scores as there are clear signs of difficulties with funding their balance sheets.
Financial results of Capital Service as at 31.12.2021
Net profit PLN 16 906 000 (EUR 3 677 000)
Assets PLN 113 000 000 (EUR 24 581 000)
Equity PLN 7 900 000 (EUR 1 718 000)
I recommend that you read the article about AlexCredit not paying investors a single euro since April 2020. Mintos occasionally send worthless statements about the negotiations and the complexity of the situation.
https://dengi.informator.ua/2022/09/09/hto-i-skilki-zaroblyaye-na-ukrayintsyah-cherez-brend-alexcredit/
For example, this article says:
The credit institution’s income for 2020 amounted to 418 million 364 thousand hryvnia , of which net profit was 18 million 940 thousand hryvnia. For the year 2021, revenues amounted to 456 million 518 thousand hryvnias and net profit – 14 million 496 thousand hryvnias. (The hryvnia-euro exchange rate before the war was in the range of 30-33 hryvnia to 1 euro.)
We can see how Mintos defends the rights of investors.
Hello, how is it possible to obtain the audited financial statements of Wowwo for the year 2021 please? Is the accounting data given to auditors really more reliable than the original presented to investors? Isn’t it now an attempt to pretend a worse situation than the real one, in order to legitimize the damage to the creditors?
Hi,
Are you planning on continuing the lender rating blog? I found it to be quite useful for a second opinion and would gladly buy you a coffee!
Best Regards
Pingback: Bilancio Moncera
Pingback: Mintos
ID Finance seems to do OK, but they have just stopped paying to investors.
“Hi xxxxx,
Over the last months, ID Finance has accumulated pending payments to investors on Mintos. To remedy this situation, ID Finance and Mintos have agreed to restructure the outstanding pending payments, as this offers the best chance of a full recovery.
We want to share the key points of the agreement between ID Finance and Mintos for the company’s pending payments:
Pending payments of ID Finance Spain and Mexico in the amount of €18 million have been restructured. ID Finance has to cover the outstanding amounts by 31 December 2022 at the latest.
To make sure you are receiving adequate interest for the period, interest for the restructured pending payments has been increased from 1.2x to 1.4x the base interest rate of the investment starting from 22 July 2022. On average, investors will receive 17.6% interest on the restructured pending payments, which is significantly above the current average market rate of 14.5%.
ID Finance has committed to not increase pending payments further. If the company fails to honor this agreement, we would look into initiating a hard default.
If you have any questions, please contact us, and we will be happy to help.
Best regards,
Your Mintos team”
Oscar, you’re doing a tremendous job! I sincerely hope, that you’ll continue the help to us small time investors in P2P lending.
July 22th Mintos notified me and other relevant investors that they restructured EUR 8.3 million pending payments from Creditstar Estonia and Finland into loans with an interest rate of 18 percent. They stated falling issuance levels and ensuing liquidity issues as the reason.
Any thoughts on that? Is it something to worry about and act on? I guess it relates to both Mintos and Lendermarket loans?
Hi! Seems that the Mintos lender ratings table is not yet updated according to the June & July 2022 updates.
For instance:
1) For “ID Finance Spain” in the update it is written: Our score is up 8 to 67. But, in the table the “ID Finance Spain” score is still 59.
2) For “Rapicredit” in the update it is written: our score increased by 10, to 45. But, in the table the “Rapicredit” score is 38 (even not 35).
Could you please update the table or clarify the differences? Thanks!
Have you given up? Almost two month since your last evaluation. And things are becomming really bad at Mintos. Your service is urgently needed!!
Pingback: Why I use neither Bondora’s Go & Grow nor Mintos Strategies - Alternative Investments
Pingback: Uitgebreide Mintos review - 10% passief rendement! - Thinkingbig.nl